• Home
  • Swanson v. Commissioner
  • 401k
  • IRA
  • 401k to ira
  • 401k contribution limits
  • roth ira rules

Archive for IRA

Epperson: Start saving for your child’s education NOW

By · Comments (0)
Sunday, January 22nd, 2012

Today Money financial expert Sharon Epperson joined us for a live Web chat Wednesday to answer your questions.

Here’s one of her answers to questions from the live chat. (See below for the full Q&A and video of Sharon’s TV appearance this morning.)

Amey asked:

“I just had a baby (4 months). I want to start saving money for him but not exactly sure of the best place to save. I was thinking about the 529 savings plan but I wasn’t sure if it HAD to be used for college. Of course I’d like him to go to college, but what if he doesn’t. what happens to that money?”

Sharon replied:

“You are so smart to start saving for his education NOW. 529 college savings plans are great ways to force you to save for college – but you must use those funds for qualified higher education expenses or pay a penalty fee when you withdraw the money. It’s like a 401k or IRA in the sense that you can take the money out without penalty if it’s used for its intended purpose – otherwise you pay a penalty. the good news is that even if your child does not go to college, the money can go to another beneficiary — you, another child, family member, friend, anyone. If you’re not sure if your child will go to college, hedge your bets. put some money in the 529 plan and some in a Roth IRA. You can use the Roth IRA for your own retirement or use the contributions you’ve made to the Roth college if needed. Actually, Roth contributions can be taken out at any time TAX-FREE, making them another great way to save.”

Here’s the full chat archive and Sharon’s TV appearance:

If you have a question for our TODAY Money experts, submit it here. 

To sign up for an e-mail reminder for our next chat, click here.

Comments (0)
Categories : withdraw from 401k
Tags : higher education, IRA, web chat

What is Your Financial Resolution?

By · Comments (0)
Friday, January 13th, 2012

With 2011 coming to a close, we are all shifting our focus to 2012 and asking what we can do to improve. Whether you want to call them resolutions, goals, or anything else, we all want to make next year even better than this year.

since nobody is here to talk about eating healthy or fitness regimens; what is your financial resolution and how are you going to do it? Max out your IRA/401k? Build up your savings? Start day trading? Learn about options or something new? Buy a home? cut back on your morning latte?

no matter how big or small, as long as it is a step in the right direction you will be glad you did it.

Also, if you have any tips to help others on their goals, feel free to chime in.

I guess I’ll start. mine is to replenish my savings account. Having a few months salary in the bank can be a lifesaver and offers piece of mind, especially in a turbulent economy. Even if that level is unattainable, something is better than nothing.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : 401k to ira
Tags : Economy, IRA, morning latte, salary

Where to Stash Your Nest Egg

By · Comments (0)
Monday, December 19th, 2011

By Kelly Greene

If you’re trying to decide where to stash your nest egg, here’s another tool.

After we flagged T. Rowe Price’s decision-making chart for retirement-account contributions, we got a reminder of the free program for weighing traditional IRAs v. Roths at the Analyze Now retirement-planning website. Go to “Computer Programs” and click on “Link to should I convert my IRA to a Roth?”

The site’s founder, Henry K. “Bud” Hebeler, a 78-year-old former top executive at Boeing who retired more than 20 years ago, offers insight to people weighing the decision:

Of course, it’s not just the tax vehicle (taxable, qualified, tax-exempt) that you use, it also makes a big difference where you put your stock investments because of their tax advantage. I put the majority of stocks in taxable accounts instead of qualified accounts. I’d put all of my stocks into a Roth except that’s where I put my TIPS so that Uncle Sam doesn’t tax my inflation growth.

He also advises making charitable contributions from the right account to get the most benefit:

Since I make significant charitable contributions every year, there are tricks I’ve learned about that too. for example, I also have a 401(k). to take advantage of the fact that you can make a tax-free contribution to a church from an IRA but not a 401(k), I take my [required minimum distribution] from the 401(k) and then roll over a significant amount more into an IRA so that when I take my RMD from it, it can all go to charity.

What’s your experience using IRAs or 401(k)s, and traditional accounts or Roths? do you have any tax strategies that you’re willing to share?

Comments (0)
Categories : ira conversion to roth ira
Tags : insight, IRA

CD options are matter of principal

By · Comments (0)
Thursday, December 1st, 2011

November 06, 2011

DEAR BRUCE: I am 84 years old and have two CDs worth about $230,000. I have my three adult children registered as equal principal beneficiaries. What are their options upon my demise? can their shares be rolled over into their IRAs, and the required minimum withdrawal be based upon their reaching 70½? Or must their withdrawal be based on my age? Is there a time limit for them to withdraw their shares? Where can I find an explanation of such benefits?

DEAR F.D.: I?m assuming that your $230,000 is in some type of tax-sheltered environment: IRA, 401(k), 403(b), etc. there are various regulations with regard to how such money has to be distributed — taxes paid, etc.

Failing that, if these are just ordinary CDs and they have your children’s names on them and have been properly set up (payable on death or something similar), the money will be split three ways upon your demise and taxes, if any, will have to be paid. the attorney advising the executor of your estate can determine precisely what your children’s rights are.

Without the specifics of this money and perhaps other monies that are in your name, it is difficult to give a very specific answer. the research involved and the costs should be minimal. I would do this immediately. it?s much easier for you to straighten out problems now than it will be for your estate after your demise.

DEAR BRUCE: I have an opportunity to collect two full pensions on my 55th birthday. I am now 49. 1) What do you think about forgoing the spousal survivor benefit and compensating with a term life insurance policy with my wife as the beneficiary? 2) Is there a rule-of-thumb formula to determine how much money to insure myself for? the total pension will be a minimum of $4,200 per month, without the spousal survivor benefit, and the mortgage will be paid off on the same date. My annuity will provide around $300,000, but we will have to purchase our own health insurance. Thank you.

DEAR D.P.: the proposal that you are making is very common, but it does have one important item that is not unique to all of us, and that is good health and insurability. the idea of forgoing the spousal survivor benefit — in other words, leaving your wife with a lower income until her death, is often not the best choice. there is no rule of thumb that I know of. you will have to do the math, looking at your income on the two benefits.

The other variable in this situation is that if you pass away, your wife will have the entire amount that the difference would have purchased, which is often more then would come to her with the survivor benefit. Further, if she passes away very quickly, that amount of money would be in her estate, which could be passed along to whomever she chooses.

I would elect to go with the insurance. Buying the insurance now at age 49 would give you a lower premium, even though the net cost would be higher. you will be developing some cash value in the policy, but more important is that you have no way of knowing whether you will be insurable six years from now. If you are insurable now and you wish to pursue this, consider taking out the insurance and guaranteeing the availability.

DEAR BRUCE: please explain the gift tax. When does it apply? who pays the tax? Thank you.

M.C., Inverness, Fla.

DEAR M.C.: the amount that you are allowed to give without any tax implications to you or the receiver is $13,000 per year, per person. In other words, every individual can give anyone else, without regard to their relationship, up to $13,000 without any tax implications. If you are a married couple and you want to give more to one of your children, each of you (assuming you file a joint return) can give that same amount of money with no tax consequences. If you wish to give more, you can claim against your lifetime estate. you would not be allowed to leave as much tax-free after your death, but you would likely not exhaust the exemption. the death tax, however, is under consideration for change by Congress. If you give away more than the exclusion available when you pass away, there would be some estate tax.

DEAR BRUCE: I would like to know if, when a person goes to a nursing home and has CDs that list either/or on the CD, whether those CDs have to be included when stating the person’s net worth. My mother has some CDs that have either/or on them with my brother’s and sister?s plus my name on them. I am not sure whether I asked this question right. Thank you.

DEAR JANICE: If your mother goes into a nursing home, she?ll have to fill out a financial form. If she applies for Medicaid, all monies up to a very small amount must be spent on her behalf. If assets remain upon her death and she has collected Medicaid, the state has an option of going after those assets. Many people scurry around and try to shelter this money from Medicaid. the best way to insure that is to give away funds exceeding the look-back period, which is 36 months. If your mother is not going to be in a nursing home after that look-back period, and she?s comfortable with giving the money to you guys knowing that you will spend it on her behalf, that?s OK. the reality is that most people who do go into nursing homes seldom live more than three years. If you or your siblings dissipate the funds, you will put yourself in some peril.

DEAR BRUCE: My wife and I are planning on setting up a will or living trust but are undecided on what would be better. We own our home and some other real estate. Stocks and mutual funds have transfer-on death beneficiaries on the accounts. can a legal assistant create wills and living trusts legally under Florida law?

DEAR J.W.: you can write your own will, and as long as a legal assistant or some other person doesn?t hold themselves out to be an attorney, they can help you draw a will or a trust. you can even buy forms in office-supply stores. That said, I think the only intelligent thing to do is to have your will set up by an attorney. In the event there are no other things to be considered — real estate, personal items, cash, etc. — the will need not be filed.

Whether you are better off with some combination of trusts and a will is another matter. If your estate is substantial, you really should sit down with a qualified planner who can tell you some of the peculiarities of the law and how you can best arrange for the least painful way to transfer those things you have acquired in life.

A lot of people seem to fear probating a will. this is not a painful process. Trusts, however, can offer a couple of benefits. one is privacy, as a will is a public document. second, if the trust has been set up properly with a professional, it?s possible that expenses that might otherwise be charged to probate the will would exceed the costs of setting up the trust. you should make sure that (in most cases) the trusts are fully revocable, which means you can cancel them as long as you are alive and competent, change beneficiaries or eliminate them altogether if you so choose. If you set up a trust and that person predeceases you, there is a question as to whether their beneficiaries would benefit from the trust or it would simply cease to exist and go back into your general estate. obviously, this can get rather complicated.

DEAR BRUCE: My husband recently transferred $20,000 to one of my accounts, unaware that this could cause tax implications for us. will this amount be subject to any federal or state taxes? We have since made the account a joint one. — N.M.. via email

DEAR N.M.: I?m a bit confused. you say that your husband put money into one of your accounts. why would this cause tax implications? Assuming that you file jointly and you haven?t separated your funds, I know of no reason why a husband and wife can?t give money to each other without any tax implication. there may be something I?m overlooking, and, if I am, I?m confident my readers will be generous and let me know, which I will address in a future column and will respond back to you.

(Interested in buying or selling a house? Let Bruce Williams’ “House Smart” be your guide. Price: $14.95. Price includes shipping and handling. Send check or money order payable to Radio Merchandise to P.O. Box 7150, Hudson, FL 34674.

Send your questions to: Smart Money, P.O. Box 7150, Hudson, FL 34674. E-mail to: . questions of general interest will be answered in future columns. Owing to the volume of mail, personal replies cannot be provided.)

(EDITORS: For editorial questions, please contact Gail Borelli at )

COPYRIGHT 2011, UNITED FEATURE SYNDICATE DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK FOR UFS

1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; (816) 581-7500

Ads by Google

Comments (0)
Categories : iras
Tags : 401 k, adult children, IRA, minimum withdrawal, Money, Monies

IRS Announces in Press Release IR-2011-103, Solo 401(k) Plan Annual Elective Deferral Contribution to Increase for 2012

By · Comments (0)
Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Miami, FL (PRWEB) November 11, 2011

on November 8, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) announced in IR-2011-103 the cost of living adjustments affecting dollar limitations for pension plans and other retirement-related items for Tax Year 2012. in general, many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2012 because the increase in the cost-of-living index met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. with respect to the solo 401K plan, the elective deferral contribution for 2012 will be increased from $16,500 to $17,000. This increased elective deferral contribution limitation will apply to all employees who participate in 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings plan. in addition, the catch-up contribution limit for those aged 50 and over remains unchanged at $5,500.

“The increased elective deferral contribution for 2012, will make the solo 401(k) plan even more popular amongst the self-employed,” stated Adam Bergman, a tax attorney with IRA Financial Group. “The significance of the elective deferral contribution increase is that participants of a solo 401(k) plan will be able to defer annually up to $49,500 if they are under 50 and $55,000 if they are over 50,” stated Mr. Bergman.

One of the major advantages of using a solo 401K retirement plan over an IRA is the high contributions that one can make on an annual basis. Unlike an IRA, a solo 401k plan allows a plan participant to make high annual contributions to the plan. the contributions can be in the form of pre-tax or Roth type contributions (after-tax).

The annual solo 401k contribution consists of two components, an employee salary deferral contribution and an employer profit sharing contribution. in 2012 the total contribution limit for a solo 401k plan participant would be $49,500 or $55,000 if age 50 or older. the total allowable contribution limits are combined to get the maximum Solo 401k contribution limit.

With respect to the employee deferral component, a solo 401K plan participant can contribute up to $17,000 per year to the plan. in addition, an additional “catch-up” contribution of $5,500 can be contributed for persons over age 50. Thus, an individual under the age of 50 can make an annual employee deferral of up to $16,500, whereas, an individual over the age of 50 can make an annual employee deferral of up to $22,500.

With respect to the employer profit sharing contribution component, the employer – not the individual – is permitted to make a tax-deductible contribution on behalf of the employee equal to an amount up to 25% of the participant’s self- employment compensation. Note – the percentage is actually 20% in the case of a solo proprietorship and a single member LLC once the tax return calculations are complete.

The IRA Financial Group was founded by a group of top law firm tax and ERISA lawyers who have worked at some of the largest law firms in the United States, such as White & Case LLP, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, and Thelen LLP.

IRA Financial Group is the market’s leading “checkbook control Self Directed IRA Facilitator. IRA Financial Group has helped thousands of clients take back control over their retirement funds while gaining the ability to invest in almost any type of investment, including real estate without custodian consent.

To learn more about the IRA Financial Group please visit our website at irafinancialgroup.com or call 800-472-0646.

Read the full story at prweb.com/releases/2011/11/prweb8954229.htm

Comments (0)
Categories : 401k plan
Tags : dollar limitations, internal revenue service, IRA, november 11, participants, Retirement

I want to convert IRA's set up with after tax contributions to a Roth IRA in 2010. Are there Tax implications?

By · Comments (0)
Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

I have several IRA's that are all funded with after tax contributions and have not been deducted from any tax return. can I convert then in 2010 to a Roth without any penalty or tax payments?

While the non-deductible contributions are not taxed upon conversion, any gains in the IRAs is fully taxable. Your records must support the non-deductible portion of the contributions.

after tax IRA's, aren't they already Roths?

Comments (0)
Categories : roth iras 2010
Tags : Conversion, IRA, Iras, tax contributions, tax payments, tax return

What are the limits on my wife contributing to an IRA if she doesnt have a 401K at work?

By · Comments (0)
Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

I do have a 401k and contribute to it but not to the max and it is a joint IRA. If she is eligible, what would the limit be?

So she does make wages. go to IRS.gov and get the info. I think it's about $4,000. It used to be $2,000. sometimes there are other variables that affect what can be contributed, like age to retirement. so you got to check it out because I don't know.

the limit is $4,000 and if she is over 50 years old, she can add an extra $1,000 for a total of $5,000

Comments (0)
Categories : 401k limits
Tags : 401k, IRA, irs gov, Retirement, variables

Which method is maxing out your 401K?

By · Comments (0)
Thursday, August 25th, 2011

Common advice is to be sure and max out your 401K contribution. are they referring to the maximum percentage that your employer matches your contribution. or are they referring to the maximum contribution set by a IRS limit, currently $15K?

Referring to max limit that you can contribute and defer your taxes. are you absolutely sure the max limit is 15K?

They probably mean the employer match. it is well worth it to you to make the most out of your employer's match since it is like free money. I think that the IRS limit is really high and unrealistic for most people to contribute into their 401K.

They are talking about the maximum contribution allowed. the reason for this is that it reduces your tax burdon while increasing the amount of money you are putting towards retirement.

Another option that you have is to contribute the maximum percentaget that your emploer matches and then take anything above and beyond that and contribute it to an IRA. You might want to do this in the case where your employers investment options aren't performing and you could do better outside.

Here's my thought. If your employer offers a matching 401k plan, then the bare minimum you should contribute is the maximum the employer will match. You will not find a better investment for your retirement savings plan. If you can afford to contribute more then I would recommend to do so as the tax defferred saving capabilties of the plan far outweigh any other investment options.

Establishing and maintaining your retirement plans should begin as early in the work life as possible. the more you contribute today, the sooner you can stop working in the future. Those who do not save for the future are destined to work forever… something I certainly don't want to do!

Good luck and I hope this helps!

Match what ever you employer matches.

It's certainly advisable to contribute to your 401k (or 403b) up to the amount matched by your employer – that's free, risk-free money.

After that, if you qualify for a Roth IRA (your income can't be too high or it's phased out), stick $5,000 in one of those. Growth in the Roth IRA is tax-FREE if withdrawn for retirement after age 59 1/2 (versus the money withdrawn from the 401k which is taxed). You're putting after-tax money into the Roth, but what you are doing is "diversifying" your risk of being in an equal or higher tax bracket at retirement.

If you think that's not possible, consider that tax rates are at historical lows and we're under a huge and growing deficit.

The MINIMUM I would invest is up to the maximum company match.

Maxing out a 401(k) refers to making the maximum contributions in a tax year, currently (as you said) $15k

Comments (0)
Categories : max 401k contributions
Tags : IRA, Match, Retirement

Can 401K or IRA be garnished to pay spousal support?

By · Comments (0)
Sunday, August 21st, 2011

if I have no job to pay spousal support can my 401K or ira be garnished? State of California.

401K's and IRA's are protected against garnishment EXCEPT for child support.

No. California law prohibits it.

No, unless it was to be split in a settlement.

Comments (0)
Categories : ira 401k
Tags : california law, child support, garnishment, IRA

What legislation will allow anyone to roll over a Trad IRA into a Roth IRA without penalty in 2010?

By · Comments (0)
Sunday, August 21st, 2011

Suze Orman wrote an article Nov 20, 2006 for Money Matters and it is posted on Yahoo Finance titled An IRA Nest Egg you Cant Pass up. Can you please refer me to this legislation because my broker doesnt seem to know anything about it and I cant find it. Thank you.

Comments (0)
Categories : roth iras 2010
Tags : Finance, IRA, Legislation, nest egg
Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • Popular actor Ben Gazzara fallece en Nueva York – Terra Perú
  • Sorry, your page could not be found (The Deal Pipeline)
  • ‘America the Beautiful’ makes better anthem
  • Go! Stage & Screen calendar: Jan. 20-26
  • FinancialSuccessInstitute.org Endorses Presidential Candidate Ron Paul's Economic Views and Asks for His View on the Self Directed 401K and Roth 401K